After downing the necessary quantity of ethanol I had the following epiphany concerning women. They’re quantum-mechanical in nature! Really, check with me:
- A woman can change her opinion anytime on any subject. Even when it should be impossible. Quantum equivalent: Tunneling, a process whereby a particle crosses an energy barrier that it should not be able to cross according to straight, classical mechanics. One moment it is to the left of the barrier, the other to the right, for no apparent reason.
- All women have the monopoly on the truth. But, as mere man, you never know beforehand what that truth is. To make matters worse, all women have different truths. Quantum equivalent: An electron cloud. You only know the position of an electron if you measure it, before that its position (truth) is undefined. All electrons may have different positions (truths), so knowing one electron’s position doesn’t tell you anything about other electron’s positions.
- Once a woman gets a hold of you, she never really lets go. She also has the spooky ability to sense when you cheat, which tends to dissolve the relationship. Quantum equivalent: Entanglement, the intertwining of the fate of two particles, no matter how distant, because they were once connected. Einstein called it ’spooky action at a distance’. Until one of those particles meets a third particle, which breaks the entanglement.
- Women always stick together against men. Quantum equivalent: Bose-Einstein condensation, in which a bunch of atoms start to behave as one big atom.
- No two women want to be seen wearing the same outfit. Quantum equivalent: The Pauli exclusion principle, the fact that no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state at the same moment.
I could go on, but the mind boggles. I’ve long since given up on trying to understand quantum mechanics, it just gave me a headache, like trying to understand time travel. These days, I take a more utilitarian approach, just using the formulas to reach the correct answer. Maybe I should start applying the same method to women, so as to get better results with them than up to now…
April 25th, 2007
|
humour |
no comments
Political Correctness (PC) purports to be about taking responsibility for the effects of your speech on others. At first sight, this seems a lofty goal.
What strikes me about proponents of PC though, is their lack of trust in their fellow man. They seem to see people as evil little critters whose speech must be constantly managed, lest it wreaks havoc on the Good.
Question is, who gets to define the Good, and who chooses the enforcers? What are the limits of this speech code enforcement? Guess what? It’s Good’s little helpers that get to define and defend Good. And since the Good is limitless, so are they.
For all their negativity towards the people, they themselves have grand plans for society. Very positive visions. Society and Man are perfectible.
I find this most puzzling. On the one hand humans cannot be trusted with something as simple as words, but at the same time they can be trusted to engineer the lives of others on an unprecedented scale. This does not compute.
A flash of insight! They’re not the same humans. Now I see. They are different. Now I understand.
This is proto-fascist, Hobbesian. The master that cannot do wrong.
Such deluded thinking. Regarding fundamentals, all are equal. All are sinful. To elevate oneself like this is the height of arrogance.
PC is just fundamentally undemocratic.
April 8th, 2007
|
politics |
one comment
Feminism has separated untold men from their wives and children. Loneliness reigns.
Women don’t seem to care.
However, the piper will call for them too when their new boyfriend the State separates them also - from their children.
Men won’t protect them.
The last step towards dictatorship and collectivism.
All will be alone, watched and controlled.
I suspect somewhere around 2084.
March 30th, 2007
|
feminism |
no comments
The wage gap is the feminist myth that women make substantially less then men. It has been thoroughly debunked in the US, for example here. On account of running into this odious piece of feminist propaganda in my own life, I did some research to clarify the local situation.
The wage gap for equal work in the Netherlands is 5% in the private sector, and 3% in the public sector. This is best explained by the lifestyle choices of women. 68% of women work part-time, only 14% of the men. When women work full-time, they work 2.9 hours less than men. 42% of women take maternity leave, only 12% of the men. 95% of all deaths in the workplace are men.
Simply put, women choose the easier, more flexible work.
Besides, no employer in his right mind would hire men if women were cheaper and performed equally.
Sources:
Emancipatie.nl
EuroStat
March 30th, 2007
|
feminism |
no comments
The most irritating feature in the new Windows Vista is User Account Control, which drives users crazy with its thousands of inane pop-ups. Is it possible there is a method to this madness?
Hmm, let’s see. It’s called UAC. Wasn’t that the company responsible for unleashing Hell in Doom3? Coincidence?
What will the effect be of UAC? Let’s see. Users starting to really, really hate security popups, to despise them even.
Why would Microsoft do that? Let’s see. What’s the greatest threat to the Windows monopoly? It’s something called Linux. What’s the main reason users switch to Linux? Security. Why is Linux so secure? Because users don’t run with administrative privileges. However, that does mean that to perform administrative tasks, you sometimes are presented with a security popup, though far less often than Windows with UAC.
Users raised in the Unix community accept this small inconvenience for the major security benefits it offers.
However, consider a user who has been exposed to UAC. He switches to Linux. Wants to change his broadband settings, for example. And is greeted by that hated security popup. And will want to run with administrative privileges, as root, from now on, because “I hate those security popups, Windows never bothered me anymore after switching off UAC”.
And that circumvents 99% of Linux’s defenses against malware. The Linux community may get just as infested by security problems as Windows, destroying its good reputation.
A masterstroke of Clouseauesque proportions. Proficiat Microsoft!
March 30th, 2007
|
computers |
no comments
Found this little gem floating around on the Internet. Seems to describe President Bush to a tee…
You befouled, vitiated poltroon. You blighted, malodorous, mephitic recreant. You are a festering boil on the ass of all humanity. You have all the backbone of a jellyfish. You moribific, feculent simpleton. Would that I could change my species, just so that I might not be associated with you. The stupendous, confounding magnitude of your insipidness astonishes me.
Read more…
March 15th, 2007
|
politics, humour |
one comment
Lock up men who pay for sex, says Harriet Harman
While I dislike the sex industry, because it tends to dehumanize both men and women, this Harriet Harman woman is just spouting feminist nonsense.
It’s the same old female aggression over and over. Shame men for their sexuality. Moral violence. A travesty of what morality should be.
Get it through your thick skull Harriet: you do *not* have the right to judge other people’s sexuality. In the same way that you do not have the right to judge other people’s religion.
If you really want to help people (both men and women) with the sexual aspect of their lives, you should respect their freedom, not take it away. And give them the skills to cope with that freedom. Which in the case of many prostitutes, would have been learned in an intact family.
Why is it intact families are dying out? Why is it women like you think you’re some kind of mommy to us all?
As an agnostic I’m not quick to quote the Bible, but in this case: Matthew 7:3.
December 18th, 2006
|
feminism |
no comments
And now for something completely different:
Mavo-humor: Een fiets op het dak gooien
Havo-humor: Dreigen een fiets op het dak te gooien
Vwo-humor: Berekenen hoe een fiets het best op een dak gegooid kan worden.
Vbo-humor: Een fiets op het dak gooien en de bezitter ook.
Gymnasium-humor: kijken welke valversnelling een fiets heeft wanneer hij op het dak gegooid wordt.
F-side humor: Het dak op een fiets gooien.
Kleuterhumor: Een driewieler op het dak gooien.
Read more…
December 10th, 2006
|
humour |
no comments
Spanish town to introduce gendered traffic signs
Although unimportant at first sight, this is misandry. There’s a lot going on beneath the surface:
“You see this stick figure as being explicitly male, exuding its maleness. Majority is power and men cannot be trusted with power, so this is a threat to women. The only solution is equality. Feminists define equality. Now be a good boy and comply.”
This is all done so people are desensitized with respect to nonsensical solutions to nonexistent problems. You can never have enough snake oil to combat the mindrays of those evil space patriarchs.
A bonus thrown in for free is that people are taught that male and female are the only two relevant classes, and that there is a malevolent schism between them.
Wait, there’s even more to be learnt: sexism (sin) is everywhere, and feminism (religion) is the answer. Repent, sinner!
Don’t you just love your thinking being controlled like that?
December 5th, 2006
|
feminism |
no comments