The road less travelled

musings of a sad geek

Women and quantum mechanics

After downing the necessary quantity of ethanol I had the following epiphany concerning women. They’re quantum-mechanical in nature! Really, check with me:

  • A woman can change her opinion anytime on any subject. Even when it should be impossible. Quantum equivalent: Tunneling, a process whereby a particle crosses an energy barrier that it should not be able to cross according to straight, classical mechanics. One moment it is to the left of the barrier, the other to the right, for no apparent reason.
  • All women have the monopoly on the truth. But, as mere man, you never know beforehand what that truth is. To make matters worse, all women have different truths. Quantum equivalent: An electron cloud. You only know the position of an electron if you measure it, before that its position (truth) is undefined. All electrons may have different positions (truths), so knowing one electron’s position doesn’t tell you anything about other electron’s positions.
  • Once a woman gets a hold of you, she never really lets go. She also has the spooky ability to sense when you cheat, which tends to dissolve the relationship. Quantum equivalent: Entanglement, the intertwining of the fate of two particles, no matter how distant, because they were once connected. Einstein called it ’spooky action at a distance’. Until one of those particles meets a third particle, which breaks the entanglement.
  • Women always stick together against men. Quantum equivalent: Bose-Einstein condensation, in which a bunch of atoms start to behave as one big atom.
  • No two women want to be seen wearing the same outfit. Quantum equivalent: The Pauli exclusion principle, the fact that no two fermions can occupy the same quantum state at the same moment.

I could go on, but the mind boggles. I’ve long since given up on trying to understand quantum mechanics, it just gave me a headache, like trying to understand time travel. These days, I take a more utilitarian approach, just using the formulas to reach the correct answer. Maybe I should start applying the same method to women, so as to get better results with them than up to now…

April 25th, 2007 | humour | no comments

Why Political Correctness stinks

Political Correctness (PC) purports to be about taking responsibility for the effects of your speech on others. At first sight, this seems a lofty goal.

What strikes me about proponents of PC though, is their lack of trust in their fellow man. They seem to see people as evil little critters whose speech must be constantly managed, lest it wreaks havoc on the Good.

Question is, who gets to define the Good, and who chooses the enforcers? What are the limits of this speech code enforcement? Guess what? It’s Good’s little helpers that get to define and defend Good. And since the Good is limitless, so are they.

For all their negativity towards the people, they themselves have grand plans for society. Very positive visions. Society and Man are perfectible.

I find this most puzzling. On the one hand humans cannot be trusted with something as simple as words, but at the same time they can be trusted to engineer the lives of others on an unprecedented scale. This does not compute.

A flash of insight! They’re not the same humans. Now I see. They are different. Now I understand.

This is proto-fascist, Hobbesian. The master that cannot do wrong.

Such deluded thinking. Regarding fundamentals, all are equal. All are sinful. To elevate oneself like this is the height of arrogance.

PC is just fundamentally undemocratic.

April 8th, 2007 | politics | one comment